Romney, Obama, and Afghanistan

120501_obama_bagram2_reut_328.jpg
photo credit: Reuters

The anniversary of Osama bin Laden’s death has spiked public interest in the foreign policy positions of President Obama and Mitt Romney — particularly with regards to fighting terrorism and the war in Afghanistan. Over the last couple of days, I have done a number of shows across the networks — but mostly have the clips from Current TV and MSNBC and want to post here (on next page).

I argue that Barack Obama deserves enormous credit (and political bragging rights) for the decision he made to send the Navy SEAL Team 6 in to get bin Laden. He would have owned the disaster had things gone badly. Mitt Romney’s views — or those he held previously criticizing the resources Obama was expending tracking down bin Laden — are not shameful or unpresidential. Those views were held by some around the President; some felt the risks were just too high to invade Pakistan’s territory and attack the secret bin Laden compound. President Obama overruled those on his team who conveyed their doubts.

The Bush/Cheney team took its eye off the bin Laden ball and turned attention and resources away from attacking bin Laden and al Qaeda and went after Saddam Hussein and later Iraqi insurgent forces instead. Al Qaeda metastasized globally during that period – and Obama’s national security team which meets every morning with him has been working one by one through the key al Qaeda commanders and plot integrators and attacking them. The President has been at the helm of this process — guided essentially by the work and focus of John Brennan, Denis McDonough, and NSC Advisor Tom Donilon.

Finally, Obama is connecting the anniversary of bin Laden’s death to a pivot point in America’s engagement with Afghanistan. In other words, America — completing substantially its strategic goal of decimating al Qaeda — is now framing the enstate of its presence in Afghanistan.

The strategic deal signed yesterday by Hamid Karzai and President Obama is binding but unspecific. Lots can go wrong with the vaguely constructed document which essentially promises that the United States will not abandon Afghanistan after combat troops fully end their mission in 2014. But the President achieved what he wanted which was to fasten Obama’s death and the general collapse of the core al Qaeda movement to a strategic shift for the United States.

Presidents find it very hard to end wars — but Obama seems well on his way to ending America’s overextension in Afghanistan as he did in Iraq.

– Steve Clemons is Washington Editor at Large at The Atlantic, where this post first appeared. Clemons can be followed on Twitter at @SCClemons
Steven Clemons directs the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation, which aims to promote a new American internationalism that combines a tough-minded realism about America̵ ...read more

Comments



Follow Us