I thoroughly enjoyed Eric Savitz‘s Can Anyone Rescue Palm ($PALM) from its Death Spiral in this weekend’s Barron’s.
Savitz goes back just far enough to give readers the quintessential story of a classic failed turnaround. At the end of the day, Palm’s failure is less a story of poor execution and more a story of tough-as-nails competitors like $RIMM and $AAPL.
Palm in the past few months has done many of the things it promised. It expanded from one phone, the Pre, to a second, lower-cost model, the Pixi. After launching service on Sprint (S), it added Verizon Wireless (VZ) as a second carrier and unveiled new versions of the existing phones, the Pre Plus and the Pixi Plus. After a slow start, it now has a steadily expanding number of applications in its equivalent of the Apple App Store. It has added carriers outside the U.S. And it has shelled out big bucks for a splashy advertising campaign.
There’s just one problem: No one is buying the phones.
There are a few questions that weren’t asked or answered in the story that I believe would be of great interest to all investors. These include:
Why did the sell-side research cadre get behind the company so early? Virtually every major firm was cheering Palm on from the beginning of its latest turnaround – were their buy ratings based on a desire to root for the underdog?
How did the tech guys get it so wrong? The Pre and Pixi caught on with the gadget guys, so why not the people?
Can we extrapolate Palm’s dissatisfaction with Verizon’s marketing assistance and figure out just how make-or-break the involvement of a carrier is in terms of tech product launches?
The smartphone market was Palm’s to lose 5 years ago…and they certainly lost it.
Source:











