Wed, May 23, 2012
The Faster Times
The Faster Times is an independent collective of journalists and writers who are looking to create a new model for the newspaper. Please support our work without spending a cent by signing up for email delivery and "liking" us on Facebook.
Email Delivery
Politics

House of Representatives to America: Yup, Let Women Die!

The U.S. House of Representatives voted Thursday to pass HR 358, otherwise known as the “Protect Life Act”—or, a bit more aptly, the “Let Women Die” Bill. The measure, first conceived in February by one Joe Pitts (R),  has had almost nine months to incubate in the fetid underbelly of the House and now emerges fully formed, ready and willing to let women die rather than allow hospitals to perform life-saving abortions. Every Republican and 11 Democrats voted in favor of the bill.  Congress, you continue to amaze me with your eagerness to bury your collective heads in the sand and step back in time every day!

Mr. Pitts, conservative fan-favorite and unabashed douchebag co-sponsor of the equally popular “forcible rape” bill, decided that a great use of time, energy, and tax-payer dollars would be to create a half-redundant measure that would whittle even further away at reproductive rights. The Affordable Care Act already prohibited federal funds from covering abortions—and we love redundant abortion laws in this country! See: UN.  However, the “Protect Life Act” would also prohibit any insurance provider that receives federal funding from offering abortion access, effectively equating to a ban on abortion through all private insurers. (And with that, how long until the promise of fully covered birth control is no more?)

Terrible, but only the tip of the iceberg when it came to the other provision of the bill.

As I wrote back in February:

Currently, all hospitals that receive Medicare or Medicaid funding are bound by the 1986 EMTALA law to provide emergency care to anyone who seeks their services, regardless of insurance status. This doesn’t mean the hospital is required to treat that person for days on end, but they are required to, at the very least, stabilize them—and if they can’t provide the care the patient needs, to transfer them to a hospital that can. If an anti-abortion hospital was to receive a woman who required an emergency abortion, under law they would be required to perform the abortion themselves, or transfer her to a hospital that would. The “Protect Life Act” would free hospitals from this obligation, giving them clearance to do nothing at all, even if the woman’s life was at risk.

The inevitable (preventable!) result? Many, many more deaths like these.

As Nancy Pelosi, former Speaker of the House said: “Under this bill, when the Republicans vote for this bill today, they will be voting to say that women can die on the floor of health care providers … it’s just appalling. I can’t even describe to you the logic of what they are doing today.”

Obama had already promised to veto the measure should it pass the House, so this basically amounts to pointless political aggrandizement as the shit-storm of the economy continues to rage. See: Occupy Wall Street.

As Rep. Ted Deutch (FL, D) said: “We could help jobless workers feed their families today, instead this bill grants hospitals the right to deny abortions even in life and death cases. We could cut taxes for small businesses today, instead this bill forbids Americans from using their own dollars to buy private insurance plans that include abortion coverage.”

What we are dealing with then, is not only a waste of time and money, but a grim, frightening taste of conservative agenda and denial. One in three women will get abortions in their lifetime. Most are women who are already married and have children. Every public dollar spent on family planning services will save three dollars in Medicaid costs. We know this, and yet we continue to use policy to barter with women’s lives.

MORE FROM MICHELLE KOUFOPOULOS

Why Defunding Planned Parenthood Will Bankrupt America

In Defense of YA Literature

GOP’s Protect Life Act Would See Women Die Before Granting Them Abortions

share save 171 16 House of Representatives to America: Yup, Let Women Die!


Michelle Koufopoulos is a writer, editor, book lover and tea enthusiast. She graduated from Sarah Lawrence College and spent a year studying at Oxford University, being indoctrinated into British culture while working on her novel set in Paris in the 1920s. She writes regularly ...

Share
  • Joanbunney

    And why it’s time to vote them out. This clearly shows that  Republican men hate women; takes us back to the dark ages, the days of the Salem Witch Hunt mindset. Very disturbing news for all American women, red, blue or polka dot.

  • SickOfTwistingTheTruth

    Good grief, did you actually read the bill? Nowhere does it say that women are going to die. All this bill does is remove coverage from Patient Protection and Affordable Care act of ELECTIVE abortions. It covers (and I’m quoting directly from the text of the bill)
    (A) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or
    (B) in the case where a pregnant female suffers
    from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that
    would, as certified by a physician, place the female in danger of death
    unless an abortion is performed, including a life-endangering physical
    condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself. Private insurance can cover if they decide to do so on their own. Good try though.

  • Joanbunney

    Yes I read it.

    “This bill is a collection of dangerous ideas that will undermine women’s health,” said Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “Most devastating, the bill eliminates protections for patients seeking care in emergency circumstances, and would allow a hospital to deny lifesaving abortion care to a woman, even if a doctor deems it necessary.”

    http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2011/10/13/house-passes-hr-358-the-let-women-die-act-of-2011

  • Hatter

    Exactly, so assuming you can afford private insurance, you’re good to go.  

    Then again, if you could afford the monthly premiums…paying for an abortion out-of-pocket wouldn’t be that big a deal.

  • Hatter

    If we ignore the funding issues of this bill, that still leaves a gaping hole:

    Under section “‘(g) Nondiscrimination on Abortion” there’s 2 items that seem like they’re there just to give docs a way out of honoring their oath to “Do no harm.”  Under current law, if you’re in need of an abortion and the doc neither does it themselves nor refers you to someone who can, they can be penalized for it.  They have to protect your life & do everything they can to save it.  They are required by law to do so.  

    Under HR 358, if you end up in a hospital bed & need an abortion, the doc can now legally say “No I’m not going to give you one,” AND “I’m not going to send you to someone who can.  I don’t care if it’d save your life.”  There’s NOTHING you can do about it.  Does it matter if you’re dying from a massive hemorrhage?  No.  Can the doc say “I’m not going to abort this fetus to save your life, just because I feel abortion is wrong.”  Yes.  Under HR 358, section (g), are  you allowed as a medical professional to withold lifesaving treatment AS LONG AS that treatment is abortion?  Yes.  

    Can you take legal action against this doctor for withholding treatment & killing your sister/mother/aunt/daughter?  Not if it falls under the definition of “discrimination” according to HR 358.

    Are (some) people missing the point here?  If the mom dies, the fetus/baby/person/whatever you want to call it, dies also.  Better to save none than one, am I right?

  • Anonymous

    You know what You guys should stop complaining because, one the health care we have now isnt as good as it was supposed to be. also the law has just been signed so give it some time. so if u want to say u have the right to choose tell that to ur congress men or state official. If you do not have insurance and need one You can find full medical coverage at the lowest price by searching online for “Penny Health” If you have health insurance and do not care about cost just be happy it and trust me you are not going to loose anything!

  • Joanbunney

    A woman, born in 1945, here’s the bottom line: no one except for a woman and her  doctor has the right to decide a woman’s right to choose albeit pro or con. It is a deeply personal matter and has no place in politics or religion. Or anything MAN-made. These so-called ‘laws’ are a sham. Women need to take back their personal freedom and respect. I’ll end where I began, kick ‘em all out.

From Our Partners...