Tue, May 22, 2012
The Faster Times
The Faster Times is an independent collective of journalists and writers who are looking to create a new model for the newspaper. Please support our work without spending a cent by signing up for email delivery and "liking" us on Facebook.
Email Delivery
Politics

Alan Grayson: What Took Us So Long to Find a Weapon Like Him?

175px alan grayson Alan Grayson: What Took Us So Long to Find a Weapon Like Him?When Florida Congressman Alan Grayson made his “Don’t get sick!” presentation, his claim that this described their approach to health-care outraged Republicans. Not content to leave it at that, the Florida Democrat flipped his placard and, twisting the dagger, read: “And if you do get sick, die quickly!”

The Republicans have had some spectacular successes in forcing the Democrats to back down, as with the resignation of Van Jones. But their calls for Grayson to apologize, especially in the wake of the “You lie” guy’s (South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson) moment in the sun, make them look like they can dish it out but they can’t take it. (For the record, I applauded Wilson’s outburst, a throwback to a wilder legislative era.)

Still, as you probably know, Grayson said he was sorry: “I would like to apologize to the dead. … and their families that we haven’t voted sooner.” In other words, he spit in the faces of Republicans.

Shortly before Grayson went viral, he was the subject of a post by Matt Taibbi at True/Slant. Seems that while Grayson was still an attorney — specializing in Iraq War whistleblower fraud cases — Taibbi had an encounter with “well, let’s call it the unique personality of Alan Grayson. … We were having a disagreement about [a source, when he began shouting] into the telephone about how. … I didn’t know who the hell I was dealing with. … One phrase I remember in particular was, ‘I am going to strip the bark off of you!’ It. . . was like being on the telephone with a metamorphosing werewolf.”

As out of character for a Democrat as Grayson must seem to Republicans, he’s capable of behaving himself. In hearings of the House Financial Services Committee to which he belongs, he’s expertly questioned the likes of Tim Geithner with both respect and persistence. Which also describes his approach to Ben Bernanke until, that is, apparently unable to contain himself any longer, Grayson just laughs in disbelief at one of the Federal Reserve chief’s responses.

But it’s with the likes of interim AIG CEO Edward Liddy that Grayson really let it all hang out. In fact, his insistence that Liddy “name names” sounds positively McCarthy-ite. Then, when he questioned Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Donald Kohn, he played the condescending and contemptuous trial lawyer to the hilt. In fact, he bullied the poor schmuck. Come to think of it, Grayson is as vicious as any Republican.

Do we really want someone like that on our side? Let’s turn that question around: What took us so long to find a weapon like him?

When Nancy Pelosi didn’t cave and pressure Grayson to apologize, but instead stood up for him, it was a watershed moment, a sea change (insert cliché of your own choosing). Along with the attention he’s generated, especially on cable TV, with appearances on CNN’s The Situation Room and various MSNBC shows, it might have a liberating effect on other Democrats. Next thing you know, on the floor of the Senate, mild-mannered Jay Rockefeller will call Republican health-care reform opponent Tom Coburn a blood-sucking ghoul.

To learn about Alan Grayson’s sensitive side — hey, even a werewolf has one — as well as what he’s accomplished and what he hopes to, read Marin Cogan’s profile of Grayson in the New Republic – Pajamas Government: The blogosphere’s man in Congress.

share save 171 16 Alan Grayson: What Took Us So Long to Find a Weapon Like Him?


Russ Wellen covers nuclear and unconventional (those either prohibited by conventions — or that should be) weapons for theFaster Times. He also writes about nuclear disarmament, as well as foreign affairs, for get="_blank">Scholars ...

Share
  • AnotherStrayCat

    You make a great point about Grayson. I don’t really know what he’s like as a person, and I’m glad I don’t know him personally, but as long as he’s not killing people in his basement I don’t really care. There is a general unwillingness in the Democratic Party to stand up to bullies, but maybe it takes a bully to stand up to them. As long as Grayson’s voting my way, I hope Floridians keep sending him up. God knows, Democrats need every solid vote they can get. And someone to display what it’s like to have a spine. Maybe we can get Reid fitted for one!

  • Marc

    Until Democrats can explain the need for a more liberal government, most of them will continue to shirk away from standing up for what they believe.

    I for one would love to see honest debate on the healthcare bill. I absolutely believe that each side should aggressively defend their position. If the Democrats want to send Grayson and the Repuublicans want to send Coburn to the debate, great, let them make the arguments in the light of day for all to hear.

    The problem for Democrats is that they cannot defend the structure of this bill in a way that will make the majority of Americans accept it. Rather than explain HOW the economics of the plan will work, they rely on cliches about historic it will be. All Americans agree it would be a good thing IF IT CAN BE PAID FOR without a huge tax bill or deficits. Short of that it will never see the support it needs to pass without procedural shenanigans.

From Our Partners...