Mon, May 21, 2012
The Faster Times
The Faster Times is an independent collective of journalists and writers who are looking to create a new model for the newspaper. Please support our work without spending a cent by signing up for email delivery and "liking" us on Facebook.
Email Delivery
Food Politics

Friday Round-Up: the Aspartame Cover-up, Elitist Foodies Suck, and Obama Approves GMO Beets

What’s everybody talking about in the world of food politics this week?

DIS-PEPSI-A If you’re one of those otherwise health-conscious people who still drinks Diet Pepsi, you might swear off it after reading Tom Philpott’s excellent back story about aspartame, our #1 diet soda sweetener. It’s a fascinating read that includes Donald Rumsfeld, a corrupt FDA official, and Monsanto. (Doesn’t it sound like the makings of a John le Carré novel?) Not only does a growing body of evidence suggest that the chemical sweetener is a carcinogen, says Philpott, a recent study of 2,500 New Yorkers shows that there’s a correlation between diet soda drinkers and strokes. Refreshing!

THE FOODIE BACKLASH The Atlantic enjoys courting controversy. Last year, the magazine published Caitlin Flanagan’s over-the-top screed against Alice Waters and her Edible Schoolyard movement, in which she argued that “forcing” children to garden keeps them from studying Shakespeare and Arthur Miller. Now, they’ve run a myopic book review by B.R. Myers that singles out the (very real) elitism and insularity of some foodies and food writers. Judging by Myers’ caricature of the Omnivore’s Dilemma as a book that elevates the eating of (sustainably-raised) meat, though, it seems that Myers has excerpted the most egregious parts of each of the books he was asked to review rather than review each book as a whole. (As anyone who has read even an iota of Pollan’s oeuvre knows, he advocates eating a plant-centered diet, with meat serving as an occasional side.)

Not that I’m going to defend any of these books—other than the Omnivore’s Dilemma, I haven’t read any of them and would much rather re-read M.F.K. Fisher. And Myers has a point: many so-called foodies are elitist and would rather brag about their latest meal at Per Se (and eating ortolan, apparently) than work to make organic fruits and veggies affordable and accessible to low-income communities. No, what pissed me off about Myers’ review was his dismissal of Slow Food as some elitist foodie club. That is such a tired cliché. If Myers had done his research, he’d know that Josh Viertel, who has been the president of Slow Food USA for three years, has reasserted the organization’s focus on food justice—the organization’s tag line is “supporting good, clean, and fair food.” That is, making sure all Americans have access to nutritious food that’s been harvested in an environmentally conscious manner by farmers who are earning a livable wage. Slow Food USA was instrumental in pushing Congress to allot more money for public school lunch programs (those bastions of elitism!) and supports many gardening and cooking initiatives at struggling public schools, including this one in Brooklyn. As Eric Schlosser pointed out in a 2008 article for the Nation, Slow Food founder Carlo Petrini believes there is nothing contradictory about championing pleasure and working for change. Fundamental to his Slow Food philosophy, Schlosser writes, is the need to “distance its celebration of pleasure from mindless decadence.”

Myers also engages in Alice Waters-bashing. Yes, Waters has an upscale restaurant in Berkeley (did it ever purport to be otherwise?) but she also pays everyone at her restaurant—including the dishwashers!—a living wage. (That Magruder Ranch veal that Myers singles out is no doubt pricey. But guess what? The farmer who raised it is making his livelihood thanks to the support of chefs like Waters. If we are to change our food system, we’re gonna need upscale restaurants who cater to the well-heeled as well as ways of subsidizing sustainably-raised food for low-income folks.) Waters also has a foundation that’s raised nearly $5 million for Edible Schoolyards, revamping the school lunch program at Berkeley public schools, and advocating for school lunch reform. No one who takes pleasure in eating food of any kind is immune from Myers’ disdain, apparently.

As with many reviews, this one tells us more about the author than it does about the books he’s ostensibly writing about. Half-way through reading “the Moral Crusade Against Foodies,” I realized that Myers must be a vegetarian. All of the passages he excerpts as examples of perverted, out-of-touch-with-the-common-man food writing have to do with…meat. (The more extreme and macho the better.) So I was not surprised to learn, in Robert Sietsema’s amusing rebuttal in the Village Voice, that Myers is both a vegan and an animal-rights activist. Good for him! But his review would’ve been stronger had he disclosed that fact up-front.

ACTION OF THE WEEK The Obama Administration just approved both Roundup Ready GMO alfalfa and Roundup Ready GMO sugar beets. (These biotech crops contain genes that are resistant to Monstanto’s infamous Roundup Ready herbicide.) Change we can believe in?  If this pisses you off, join the Food Democracy Now letter-writing campaign. Their smart sample letter reads, in part: “In order to protect the biological integrity of our nation’s seeds and the organic industry, we call upon you as President to immediately rescind the recent approval of GMO alfalfa and instruct the Secretary of Agriculture to implement a moratorium on the further approval of genetically engineered crops until the issues over the science, contamination and labeling are more transparently reviewed.”

share save 171 16 Friday Round Up: the Aspartame Cover up, Elitist Foodies Suck, and Obama Approves GMO Beets
Share


Hannah Wallace writes about food justice, integrative medicine, and travel. She is a frequent contributor to Whole Living (formerly Body + Soul), Portland Monthly, and T: Travel, and her articles and book ...

100

MORE FROM Hannah Wallace:

  1. TFT Interview: Malik Yakini of Detroit’s Black Community Food Security Network
  2. TFT Interview: Slow Food’s Josh Viertel
  3. Cleveland’s Food Justice Hero: Councilman Joe Cimperman
  • Anna Smith Clark

    It is great to see an article that doesn’t live off the history of Slow Food and comments on what it is actually doing and looking to do today. There are many people in Slow Food that do not fall under the elitist category that volunteer a lot of time to see changes happen for all. Slow Food has become an grassroots group of individuals working to make change in the food movement for all. I work with the nine Slow Food chapters in the Bay Area and there is a lot of good work being done.
    The other point that is really important is that we don’t need the bashing we only fight ourselves. We need to realize that we will need all parts of our socio/economic society to stand as one to have a strong voice. Otherwise we are far to segmented. We need all part of the food movement to stand together, farmers, advocates, parents, teachers, those fighting for food sovereignty, restaurants – all are looking to change the food system we need to work together – Slow Food encompasses all these passions and looks to unify and build strength in the voice.

  • John E. Garst, Ph.D. (Medicinal Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Nutrition)

    The cited Philpott story and its cited poorly controlled scientific study both reflect widespread ignorance about the subject, this time thinly veiled as ‘diet Pepsi’, but with the implication that aspartame is the cause. This could not be further from the truth.

    First, the fundamentals of toxicology (the science of poisons) say “everything is toxic” and dose alone separates a food/drug from a poison. For example botulinum toxin, perhaps the most toxic substance known, is used extensively in cosmetic procedures. High toxicity cyanide found in plant products we all consume is, however, innocuous at those doses. In contrast low-toxicity water drowns hundreds yearly. Any claim a chemical substance is “toxic” or poison is by itself is MEANINGLESS. Such claims MUST include a specific toxic response and specific dose. Aspartame critics cannot do this!

    Second, aspartame is GI-degraded to its three components, which are more abundant in common foods and two are even essential for life. Food-borne methanol whatever its source is oxidized to formaldehyde and then formate. Formate is recycled (reduced) by the folate-B12 vitamins to methyl groups used to synthesize (thymine, in DNA), methylate (regulate) DNA, and detoxify truly-toxic homocysteine. Phenylalanine is used to biosynthesize epinephrine, etc. These ingredients are simply not a toxicological issue at the allowed doses of aspartame.

    Third, aspartame has been extensively studied; adverse claims have been consistently disproven the latest in August in New Zealand. Anti-aspartame arguments fostered by internet conspiracy theorists, who profit from books, detoxification kits, etc., all predate 1998. In 1998 folate vitamin supplementation was mandated for cereal grain products, because of population-wide deficiency. [Reread the Philpot story and note all criticism of aspartame in that article originate before 1998. The reader should also be informed that all questions raised about aspartame approval stemmed from the now well-known folate deficiency in the Sprague-Dawley rats used.]

    Any disease connections like this supposed new study raise with diet drinks most likely reside in personal folate deficiency or related underlying biochemical issues (see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2592326/pdf/0541545.pdf or http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2329900/pdf/0540036.pdf). These personal problems are often mistaken for arguments against aspartame. But such arguments are like saying it was the ‘straw that broke the camel’s back, not the tons of cargo already there.’ I didn’t see this forty year old known folate issue even mentioned, much less-controlled, did you? That makes this poor science, doesn’t it? Why do we pay for garbage science? But worse, in this case that added ‘cargo’ could well involve both folate issues and caffeine in diet Pepsi. Caffeine generates two equivalents of formate during degradation compared to one from aspartame’s methanol. But both caffeine and aspartame require folate for detoxification, so again any issue with ‘diet Pepsi’ likely reflects personal health problems with folate or folate-related biochemistry, not the soft drink itself.

    John E. Garst, Ph.D. (Medicinal Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Nutrition)

  • http://www.communaltable.com Adrian Hale

    Thanks for keeping us informed!

Get our Newsletter