Thu, May 17, 2012
The Faster Times
The Faster Times is an independent collective of journalists and writers who are looking to create a new model for the newspaper. Please support our work without spending a cent by signing up for email delivery and "liking" us on Facebook.
Email Delivery
Academic Politics

Don’t Mess With a Bunch of Pissed-Off Medievalists

Paleography is the study of old handwriting—the fine art of telling Corbie AB from Beneventan from Carolingian minuscule. It may seem weird, esoteric, and irrelevant—the sort of thing that Dungeons and Dragons players do when they grow out of rolling their D20s. Well, it is weird and nerdy, but, much like statistics and server maintenance, it’s far from irrelevant.

You see, people in the past didn’t write in 12-point Times New Roman. The monks recopying Cicero and Lucretius in medieval monasteries used something that looks, to the modern eye, like a code. Before all those ancient texts we use in our classrooms and our research could be read and analyzed and synthesized and published in textbooks, they had to be deciphered. Paleography also helps us find out how texts relate to one another, and helps us date and even place their location. Without paleography, we wouldn’t have history, and we’d be missing a huge chunk of Western culture. Paleography, in other words, Is Important. It’s the “basic science” of history that lets new discoveries be made.

The folks at King’s College London seem to think otherwise. As Cambridge Classics don Mary Beard reported in her blog, the pointy-heads at that institution have decided to “create financially viable academic activity by disinvesting from areas that are at sub-critical level with no realistic prospect of extra investment.” To decipher their code, what this means is that the country’s only endowed paleography chair isn’t bringing in money and, being dedicated to the scribblings of dead white men, isn’t serving any political purpose, so it’s being downsized. Never mind the cultural value or the distinguished history of the chair: Show me the money. (One wonders if the reason that the so-called Dark Ages were so ill-documented is because barbarian kings and churchmen also decided to “disinvest from areas that were at sub-critical level,” like writing history and recopying ancient literature, and instead decided to concentrate on copying Bibles and whacking one another.)

The response to this was immediate and amazing. Professor Beard called for a public outcry and no less an imposing figure than Jeffrey Hamburger, head of Medieval Studies at Harvard, has taken the lead in protesting the decision. There’s a Facebook group for you to join and an online petition. Thousands of people have already signed up. The paleography chair at King’s may be doomed, but it will not go gentle into that good night.

All of this goes to show the truth of what I have constantly said: The value of esoteric subjects like paleography and medieval history isn’t in the dollars and cents (or pounds and pence). It’s that people are legitimately, passionately interested in them. There is a worldwide market demand for these studies, and in this era of interconnection and the “long tail” marketing plan, this demand can not be ignored.

share save 171 16 Dont Mess With a Bunch of Pissed Off Medievalists
Share


Ken Mondschein received his Ph.D from Fordham University, and has also studied at Boston University, SUNY Buffalo, and Harvard. Besides his academic work, he has written for Nerve, the New York Press, Billionaires for Bush, Freezerbox, and Jewcy. He lives near Northampton, ...

667

MORE FROM Ken Mondschein:

  1. USDA Reclassifies Pepper Spray as a Vegetable
  2. Time will Tell: Occupy Wall Street in Historical Context
  3. The Argument Against College Sports
  • Vincenzo Matera

    Dear Ken,
    You write “people in the past didn’t write in 12-point Times New Roman”. This is, at least, an half-truth :-) Stanley Morison couldn’t have designed Times New Roman without his deep knowledge of mediaeval scripts and early typographical alphabets: see, e.g., plates 10 and 13 of Nicolas Barker, _Stanley Morison_, Harvard UP, Cambridge, Mass., 1972.
    Times New Roman is a most elegant and balanced revisitation of Caroline minuscule, through the “Gros Cicero” of Granjon.
    Vincenzo Matera

  • Nathaniel Campbell

    While I am encouraged by your support of the palaeography chair at King’s College, I am distressed by the fact that you seem convinced that the principal value of medieval manuscripts is that they preserve CLASSICAL literature–as if anything composed during the “so-called Dark Ages” isn’t worth reading. I must beg to differ. In fact, if one prescinds from the prejudicial view that any Latin written after Constantine is “vulgar”, one will quickly see that the 12th century was one of the greatest periods of Latin literature in the history of the language. Poetry, history, autobiography, satire, epic–all find in 12th-century pens an admirable expression to rival the “Golden Age” of Augustus. The contents of medieval manuscripts are, in fact, far more valuable as records of the continuous history of western civilization than they are witnesses to some “Golden Age” separated by a millenium of darkness. There were no “Dark Ages”. Can we not finally put that myth, invented by the arrogant “Renaissance”, to bed?

  • http://kenmondschein.com Ken Mondschein

    You’re being pedantic…

  • http://kenmondschein.com Ken Mondschein

    Sorry, simul-post. Vincenzo was being pedantic.

    Nathaniel: You are reading far too much into my piece. As a medievalist and historian of medieval intellectual history, I am very, very aware of the creativity of European civilization. However, the fact is that medieval history seems weird and marginal to the general reader of a site such as this one. I wanted to show the importance of paleography to a discipline NOT my own by highlighting the little-known fact that most works from antiquity – which anyone would, or at least should, recognize as important – are known from medieval recopying.

    When writing general-audience pieces such as this one, a choice has to be made in how to appeal to one’s audience. Inevitably, all parties will not be satisfied.

  • http://rogueclassicism.com/2010/02/05/citanda-oped-about-the-kings-college-paleography-kerfuffle/ Citanda – OpEd About the King’s College Paleography Kerfuffle « rogueclassicism

    [...] Don’t Mess With a Bunch of Pissed-Off Medievalists | Academic Politics. [...]

  • http://tenthmedieval.wordpress.com/2010/02/12/the-kcl-situation/ The KCL situation « A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe

    [...] huge effort on the Internet is already reaching the stage of self-congratulation, which is dangerous: we haven’t achieved anything yet. More cynical voices are arguing that [...]

  • http://www.google.com Google

    The best website……

    Hey Websmaster , Awesome blog , if you need backlinks to your website I provide upto 10,000 high quality SEO backlinks for only $5. Check it out here :http://bit.ly/msweL2…

Get our Newsletter